Many states have properties that organic food is good for health, especially children. But new research says another. According to research results published by Stanford University by the Annals of Internal Medicine, organic food did not contain nutrients that children need. Precisely nonorganic foods contain more nutrients they need. The same research results issued by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP).

Is this common perception of organic foods wrong? Not necessarily. Although organic food has no nutritional otherwise than non-organic foods, but organic food has a low toxicity pesticides.

Food health experts, have a good reason why he still provide organic food for her baby. Most main reason is to protect children from toxic pesticides. It also presents the results of research that could be a reference the importance of organic food for the little guy.

First, non-organic food contains perstisida 32 percent higher than organic food. After investigation, a group of children who eat a lot of organic foods have lower pesticide content results in urine. And children who were given organic food for 5 days appeared to have good health. Indeed, children were given non-organic food to stay healthy. But Debbie does not guarantee whether these children have good health in a long time. Maybe now the children are healthy. But what they are still healthy in 2032?

Second, children who ate organic foods have a low risk of suffering from eczema or chronic skin disorder than children of non-organic food diet.

Third, breast-feeding mothers who eat organic food turned out to have a low fat content in their milk. So that his son could avoid the risk of obesity.

Source : http://parentsindonesia.com/article.php?type=article&cat=solution&id=549